I dare to say, every writer has that great movie in his/her head. (Btw: Let me know, if there's another method!) My first go transferring a brain movie to paper ends up with something between 6 and 40 pages. Which is okay until I judge one story could have the potential of a full grown 400 pages book. I regularly panic then! How could I ever reach that number, when my whole plot is already told in 10% of the needed pages? From where should I only get the other 90%? Of course I know better, those few pages are just a very, very basic plot line.
In the following time I consider myself as a director, only my two media are exchanged. And I use the very same aspects a screenplay has:
- Act & scene
- Action: description of what the viewer sees.
- Camera: instructions for the camera.
- Cut: instructions for cutting.
- Sound/music: noises and music instructions.
- Character: name of the person, who's going to speak.
- Dialogue: spoken text of the character.
- Additional information for the character, of how to speak the text.
- Costumes, hair and make-up to emphasize the character's personality.
- Props, used by the characters.
- Set design, how does the set improve, influence, give atmosphere during the scene.
- Etc.
P.S. That 1% exception, where the movie is better than the book, I have to grand Mr. Peter Jackson. What he did with 'Lord of the Rings' was simply outstanding!
Have you considered doing the NaNoWriMo script writing challenge? I agree that most books are better than the movie (though I also agree with you about the Lord of the Ring movies). Thanks for stopping by my blog.
Hi Sheila,
I've participated last year's NaNo challenge - successfully ... was quite interesting, learnt a lot and gained a lot of new cognitions about me and my writing! I haven't decided yet, if I participate this year, but I keep an eye open! :-)
My ideas play out in my head like a movie long before I begin writing. And you're right - the LOTR movies wee better than the books.
I love this - as a Director (for theater, not film) your take on the process is awesome. One thing I have learned to love as a Director is letting other people take care of details which I think either approve or send them back to the "drawing board." (Have you noticed when we focus on a certain day of the week that letter drops in, dangerously often?)
I am grateful I found you via the AtoZchallenge. I hope to read more of you!
My blog may be found here.
Hi Alex,
my theory seems to fit, that most (every?) authors play brain movies! Good to know.
Hi Julie,
well, as a writer it's quite hard to delegate things ... or you use a Ghostwriter! ;-)
Thanks for having you here! Hope you enjoy your time! :-)
Hi, I enjoyed reading your post, and I, too, have been disappointed several times with what was a great book being turned into a mediocre movie. They change the facts, the ending, the story and expect people to love the movie. Pu-leeze! I agree with the eval of the Lord of the Rings. After seeing the movie, I went back and reread the book. Thanks for the great insights. Ruby
You're right that books are usually better than the movies, the exceptions (for me) being Lord of the Rings, Avatar, and Eat Pray Love.
I also agree that most writers have a movie running in their heads while they're writing. I know I do.
Hi Ruby,
thanks a lot for your lovely words! *smiles*
I think, sometimes you just have to forget, that you know the book and/or expect the same things like in the book. 'Harry Potter & the Prisoner of Askaban' is my most favorite book of the series, when the movie came out I was so excited and made the big mistake to reread the book just before I saw the movie. You can imagine, how much disappointed I was! But with a little distance and objectivity, in the meantime I like the movie, too! For its own, but not in comparison with the book.
Hi Carol,
there's no discussion, Avatar is a blast of a movie, but *hmm* I haven't known, that it's based on a book?!?! About Eat.Pray.Love. I can't say anything, I haven't read the book.